x86: Eliminate result signage problem in asm-x86_64/bitops.h
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like this: boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit() you get an unsigned long result if "boolean" is true, and a signed long result if "boolean" is false. In file included from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/mmzone.h:15, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/gfp.h:4, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/slab.h:14, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/percpu.h:5, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/rcupdate.h:41, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/dcache.h:10, from /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:275, from /home/cel/src/linux/fs/nfs/sysctl.c:9: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function â__first_nodeâ: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:229: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function â__next_nodeâ: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:235: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h: In function â__first_unset_nodeâ: /home/cel/src/linux/include/linux/nodemask.h:253: warning: signed and unsigned type in conditional expression [ tglx: arch/x86 adaptation ] Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent
92b2dc79
Please register or sign in to comment