omap: gpio: Simultaneously requested rising and falling edge
Some chips, namely any OMAP1 chips using METHOD_MPUIO, OMAP15xx and OMAP7xx, cannot be setup to respond to on-chip GPIO interrupts in both rising and falling edge directions -- they can only respond to one direction or the other, depending on how the ICR is configured. Additionally, current code forces rising edge detection if both flags are specified: if (trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING) l |= 1 << gpio; else if (trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING) l &= ~(1 << gpio); else goto bad; This change implements a toggle function that will modify the ICR to flip the direction of interrupt for IRQs that are requested with both rising and falling flags. The toggle function is not called for chips and GPIOs it does not apply to through the use of a flip_mask that's added on a per-bank basis. The mask is only set for those GPIOs where a toggle is necessary. Edge detection starts out the same as above with FALLING mode first. The toggle happens on EACH interrupt; without it, we have the following sequence of actions on GPIO transition: ICR GPIO Result 0x1 0 -> 1 (rising) Interrupt 0x1 1 -> 0 (falling) No interrupt (set ICR to 0x0 manually) 0x0 0 -> 1 (rising) No interrupt 0x0 1 -> 0 (falling) Interrupt That is, with the ICR set to 1 for a gpio, only rising edge interrupts are caught, and with it set to 0, only falling edge interrupts are caught. If we add in the toggle, we get this: ICR GPIO Result 0x1 0 -> 1 (rising) Interrupt (ICR set to 0x0) 0x0 1 -> 0 (falling) Interrupt (ICR set to 0x1) 0x1 0 -> 1 ... so, both rising and falling are caught, per the request for both (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING). Signed-off-by: Cory Maccarrone <darkstar6262@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
parent
1866b545
Please register or sign in to comment